Shiflett v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
This appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree for killing his wife and sentenced to the penitentiary for life.
At the conclusion of the evidence for the State defendant’s counsel moved to exclude the evidence for that (in substance) it was not sufficient to support a verdict of guilt. The court overruled the objection and defendant excepted. This is not improper practice in criminal cases, though not permissible in civil cases. Robinson v. State, 222 Ala. 541, 133 So. 578; Langham v. State, 243 Ala. 564(10), 11 So.2d 131.
The witnesses for the State had testified that Elizabeth…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hornsby v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Spicer v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Oliver v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gautney v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Voudrie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Chaney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Snipes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.