Legal Opinion
Canal Authority of the State of Florida v. Miller
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 30, 1969No. Nos. J-454, J-455PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting Chief Judge.
The petitioner in condemnation proceedings has appealed from an order entered by the Circuit Court for Putnam County denying its motion for a supplemental order of taking.
The sole question presented for our determination in this appeal is whether the said court erred in refusing to enter a supplemental order of taking based upon a determination by the condemning authority that the fee simple title was necessary where the defendants did not show bad faith, fraud, illegality, or gross abuse of discretion.
The appellant, which is vested with the power of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilton v. County St. JohnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Spafford v. Brevard County, FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Peavy-Wilson Lumber Co. v. County of BrevardSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
- Spafford v. Brevard CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Sibley v. Volusia CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Canal Authority v. MillerSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- State Department of Transportation v. MyersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Litzel v.Canal AuthorityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- City of Pensacola v. BlanchardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Dade County v. Maule Industries, Inc., Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.