Legal Opinion · Dissent

Campos v. Courtesy Ford, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 27, 2005No. 3D03-3030Published

1DissentCope, J.

Under the replevin statute, “Any person whose personal property is wrongfully detained by any other person ... may have a writ of replevin to recover said personal property and any damages sustained by reason of the wrongful taking_” § 78.01, Fla. Stat. (1998) (emphasis added). For purposes of the summary judgment motion of defendant-appellee Courtesy Ford, Inc., the record must be read in the light most favorable to plaintiff-appellant Jorge Campos.

Read in the required light, the plaintiff was a mechanic employed by the defendant automobile dealership in its repair department. In May 1998,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ocala Foundry & Machine Works v. LesterSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  2. Christopher Advert. Group v. R & B HoldingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. HEG, Inc. v. Bay Bank & Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API