Legal Opinion
Harlem Savings Bank v. Melzer
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1978PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Alexander Chananau, J.
The receiver herein has presented an ex parte application, consented to by the attorneys for the plaintiff foreclosing mortgagee and by the surety on the receiver’s bond, for an order settling the receiver’s account, fixing her commissions and fixing a fee for her attorney. The application is granted to the extent of settling the receiver’s account as filed, fixing her commissions and discharging her and the surety.
*143The file indicates that no order has ever been made authorizing the receiver to employ counsel and absent such an order the receiver has…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Kenneth Bove & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Marine Midland Realty Credit Corp. v. Drake Evergreen Park Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by3 opinions
- Krist v. Aetna Casualty & SuretyWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Kraizberg v. FrankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Emigrant Savings Bank v. Elan Management Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1982