Legal Opinion
Ruzsa v. Rubenstein & Sendy Attys at Law
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 17, 2008No. Docket 07-0089-cvPublishedCited by 129 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff-appellant Istvan Ruzsa commenced this pro se action against the law firm of Rubenstein & Sendy on December 12, 2005, seeking relief for alleged wrongdoing — specifically, legal malpractice and theft — arising from a 1995 car accident. Rubenstein & Sendy moved for a more definite statement, and the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Janet C. Hall, Judge) granted that motion on February 2, 2006, ordering Ruzsa to file an amended complaint by March 31, 2006. Ruzsa did not file an amended complaint by that deadline and, indeed, did nothing further to pursue…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States of America, Ex Rel., Walter M. Drake v. Norden Systems, Inc., and United Technologies CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
3Cited by129 opinions
- Lewis v. RawsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Cusamano v. SobekDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Davis v. Town of HempsteadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Local Union No. 40 of the International Ass'n of Bridge v. Car-Win Construction Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Portorreal v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.