Legal Opinion
City of Hoboken v. Jarka Corp.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 17, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered
2Per curiam
Two errors require reversal of the judgments of the Division of Tax Appeals.
The first is that the Division failed to follow the procedure set forth in Fifth Street Pier Corp. v. City of Hoboken, 22 N. J. 326 (1956), in that opportunity was not given to except to the panel report. It should be noted that the Division here took final action before we decided the Fifth Street Pier Corp. case.
The second is that although counsel for respondent offered no proof in support of the allegation of discrimina tion and at the hearing stated he was limiting the appeals…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Fifth Street Pier Corp. v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Delaware, Lackawanna and Western RR Co. v. NeeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Gibraltar Corrugated Paper Co. v. Township of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
4Cited by3 opinions
- City of Union City v. Ormond Tool & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010