Legal Opinion

Soo Line Railroad Company v. Travelers Indemnity Company, The

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided May 30, 2019No. 0:18-cv-01989Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Soo Line Railroad Company, Case No. 18-cv-1989 (SRN/TNL) doing business as Canadian Pacific, Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, v. ORDER The Travelers Indemnity Company, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, v. Continental Insurance Company, as successor in interest to certain policies issued by Harbor Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendant/Counter Claimant. Arthur G. Boylan, Joseph W. Anthony, and Norman H. Pentelovitch, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, 90 South Seventh Street, Suite 3600, Minneapolis, MN 55402 (for Soo Line…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sherman v. Winco Fireworks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Gaylon Hofer v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  3. Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Prokosch v. Catalina Lighting, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
  5. Harris Ex Rel. the Estate of Ward v. Fedex National LTL, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API