Legal Opinion

Baird v. Nicholson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

Suit was brought by the receiver against the defendants on indorsements of promissory notes aggregating, with interest, approximately $40,000. All indorsements are as follows:

“For value received we hereby guarantee the payment of the within note at maturity or at any time thereafter, with interest, as therein specified, and hereby waive protest, due presentment, demand and notice of non-payment thereof; and we hereby waive diligence on the part of the holder thereof in collecting the said note; and consent to any extension of time of payment, or any renewal of this note.”

The plaintiff claims…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fearnley v. FearnleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. Andersen v. ReslerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State Bank v. MaierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Lloyd Mortgage Co. v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Noyes v. YoungMontana Supreme Court · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williston Savings and Loan Asso. v. KellarNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API