Legal Opinion

Helmsley-Spear, Inc. v. Fishman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Initially, we find that plaintiffs made out a cause of action for *456private nuisance. The Court of Appeals decision on November 24, 2008 was premised on the fact that the complaint alleged a cause of action for private nuisance. This is made clear in the opening sentences of the decision: “The issue on this appeal is whether plaintiffs’ private nuisance cause of action is preempted by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). We hold that it is not” (11 NY3d 470, 472 [2008] [emphasis added]). The Court, in discussing whether federal law preempted plaintiffs’ action, also held: “The tort of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Helmsley-Spear, Inc. v. FishmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Huntingdon Life Sciences, Inc. v. Stop Huntingdon Animal CrueltyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API