Legal Opinion

Bohmann v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 2, 1925No. 11,060PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiff in error is hereinafter referred to as “plaintiff”; defendant in error, the Industrial Commission of Colorado, as “the commission”; defendant in error, J. M. Simpson Woodworking Company, as “the employer”; and defendant in error, the Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd., as “the insurer.”

Plaintiff, alleging he was permanently injured in the service of the employer, and that said injury was one arising out of and in the course of his employment, filed his claim "with the commission. Hearing was duly had and the claim disallowed. The cause was then taken to the district…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Newkirk v. Golden Cycle Mining & Reduction Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API