Legal Opinion

Palo v. Town of Fallsburg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.

We affirm. “It is well settled that where, as here, a municipality has enacted a prior written notice statute pertaining to its thoroughfares or sidewalks, it cannot be held liable unless such written notice of the allegedly defective or dangerous condition was actually given” (Gagnon v City of Saratoga Springs, 51 AD3d 1096, 1097 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 706 [2008] [footnote and citations omitted]; see Stride v City of Schenectady, 85 AD3d 1409, 1410 [2011]; Westbrook v Village of Endicott, 67 AD3d 1319, 1319 [2009]). Defendant clearly satisfied its evidentiary burden on this issue by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Amabile v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Yarborough v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Dalton v. City of Saratoga SpringsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Gagnon v. City of Saratoga SpringsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Boice v. City of KingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. HUME, HAVAH v. TOWN OF JERUSALEMAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API