Legal Opinion

(PC) Miner v. Rudas

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 12, 2020No. 2:17-cv-01896Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY MINER, No. 2:17-cv-1896-MCE-EFB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 W. DAVID SMILEY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants move for summary judgment. ECF No. 29. For the reasons that 19 follow, the motion must be granted. 20 I. The Complaint 21 Following screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (ECF No. 8), two claims remain in this 22 action: (1) for deliberate…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Rhodes v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Lance Jett v. M. Penner, D. Peterson, and Cheryl K. Pliler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API