Legal Opinion

Nasal v. Burge, 08-Ca-07 (4-3-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 2009No. 08-CA-07PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Miami County Prosecutor Gary Nasal appeals from the trial court's decision and entry dismissing his complaint seeking enforcement of R.C. 2950.031, which prohibits certain sex offenders from residing within one thousand feet of any school.1

{¶ 2} The record reflects that appellee Edward Burge was convicted of corruption of a minor in March 2000 and designated a sexually oriented offender. In 2003, the General Assembly enacted R.C. 2950.031, which imposed residency restrictions on certain sex offenders. The restrictions included a prohibition against Burge establishing or occupying…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. White v. Billings, Ca2006-09-072 (8-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. City of Lancaster v. Lawson, 07 Ca 46 (6-9-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State ex rel. White v. BillingsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Nasal v. Burge, 2007 Ca 3 (8-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'Brien v. Hill, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API