Legal Opinion

Sheila Venable v. Penny Pritzker

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 30, 2015No. 15-1052UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed in part, affirmed as modified in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2Per curiam

Sheila Venable appeals the district court’s orders denying her motion to strike; granting summary judgment to her former employer, the U.S. Bureau of the Census (“the Bureau”), 1 on her claims un der Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) 2 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”); 3 and denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motions for reconsideration. 4 We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kloeckner v. SolisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Patricia Hentosh v. Old Dominion UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alston v. State of Maryland Department of HealthDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  2. Clarke v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
  3. Grayson Cotes v. Allegis Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2026
  4. Lakewood Investment Group Limited Partnership v. JacobsenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
  5. Matthews v. Equifax Info. Srvcs. LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API