Legal Opinion

Dey v. McAlister

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1918No. Civil No. 1620PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Original proceeding. Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtFranklin, C. J.

This is an application for a peremptory writ of mandamus to issue from this court, compelling the judge of the superior court of the state of Arizona in and .for Graham county to set a cause for trial. We will consider the scope of the writ applied for as compelling action by the superior court, as well as the judge thereof. To do this will prejudice no right of the defendant, and to do otherwise would permit mere technicality to cause delay.

The function of a writ of mandate is to compel the performance of an act which the law especially enjoins as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PhelpsArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Zuniga v. Superior Court of StateArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. AllisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. State ex rel. Corbin v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API