In re Justin A.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The appellant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that he was not properly arraigned on the petition alleging his violation of a condition of his term of probation (see Matter of Nathaniel P., 58 AD3d 860, 861 [2009]; cf. People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 316 [2004]). In any event, the Family Court complied with the requirements of Family Court Act § 360.3 (2) and (4) applicable to the first appearance following the filing of the petition of violation.
*1220The appellant further contends that the allocution during which he admitted the probation violation was defective. Contrary to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. NievesNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- In re Ashley P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re Leonard J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re Benjamin J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re William VV.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Janmalone R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Janmalone R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Paul T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Paul T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Racheal M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.