Legal Opinion

In re Barr

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 18, 1997No. 24582PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent has submitted a conditional admission and agrees to be suspended from the practice of law for two years, retroactive to the date of his temporary suspension. We accept the conditional admission.

*241 The Smith Matter

On June 3,1993, respondent received insurance proceeds of $30,000 in settlement of a claim made on behalf of his client Janet Smith. The following day, respondent distributed $5,500 of that money to Ms. Smith and retained $10,000 in attorney’s fees and $462 in costs. A balance of $14,038 remained from the proceeds.

Respondent…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Total Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. In re BarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API