Legal Opinion

Rose v. Black & White Cab Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 25, 1953No. 5-111PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is a claim for workmen’s compensation for an injury received by Gustaf Rose while driving a taxicab upon which the appellee’s name was painted. The Commission denied the claim upon a finding that Rose was an independent contractor rather than an employee.

This company does not own the taxicabs which bear its name. Each vehicle is owned by a driver, although in most instances the company finances the purchase by means of a conditional sales contract which requires the driver to pay $5.00 a day until the car is paid for.

The company makes no payments of any kind to the various drivers.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lockeby v. Ozan Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Razorback Cab of Fort Smith, Inc. v. LingoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Townsend Paneling, Inc. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. Adams v. SummersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  4. Eisen v. Black & White Cab Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API