Rose v. Black & White Cab Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.
This is a claim for workmen’s compensation for an injury received by Gustaf Rose while driving a taxicab upon which the appellee’s name was painted. The Commission denied the claim upon a finding that Rose was an independent contractor rather than an employee.
This company does not own the taxicabs which bear its name. Each vehicle is owned by a driver, although in most instances the company finances the purchase by means of a conditional sales contract which requires the driver to pay $5.00 a day until the car is paid for.
The company makes no payments of any kind to the various drivers.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lockeby v. Ozan Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
3Cited by4 opinions
- Razorback Cab of Fort Smith, Inc. v. LingoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Townsend Paneling, Inc. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Adams v. SummersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- Eisen v. Black & White Cab Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968