Nathaniel Hawthorne Williams v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
The appeal is from an order entered, without an evidentiary hearing, upon a post trial motion filed by appellant, which motion was considered by the court as one filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
The allegations of the motion may be summarized as an attack upon the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury verdict of guilty rendered against appellant in a previously tried criminal case. It clearly constitutes a collateral attack upon the judgment of conviction and does not constitute sufficient grounds for relief under § 2255. 1
Appellant’s brief raises the question of an attempt by him…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- John Benson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Bobby Gene RantzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Herbert Boyd Hayes, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Eliseo Aragon-PandoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993