Legal Opinion

Nathaniel Hawthorne Williams v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 11, 1967No. 8809PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The appeal is from an order entered, without an evidentiary hearing, upon a post trial motion filed by appellant, which motion was considered by the court as one filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

The allegations of the motion may be summarized as an attack upon the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury verdict of guilty rendered against appellant in a previously tried criminal case. It clearly constitutes a collateral attack upon the judgment of conviction and does not constitute sufficient grounds for relief under § 2255. 1

Appellant’s brief raises the question of an attempt by him…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. John Benson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Bobby Gene RantzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. Herbert Boyd Hayes, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. Eliseo Aragon-PandoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API