Legal Opinion
D'ONOFRIO v. SFX Sports Group, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 18, 2008No. Civil Action 06-0687(JDB)PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Audrey (“Shebby”) D’Onofrio brought this civil action alleging that she was discriminated against on the basis of her gender and pregnancy by her employer defendant SFX Sports Group, Inc. (“SFX”), a wholly owned subsidiary of defendant Live Nation, Inc., which in turn was formerly a subsidiary of defendant Clear Channel Communications, Inc. 1 She filed suit on March 13, 2006 in the Superi- or Court of the District of Columbia. In addition to naming the aforementioned corporations as defendants, plaintiff added Dan Rosier and Kimberley…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Exponential Biotherapies, Inc. v. Houthoff Buruma N.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- The Urban Institute v. Fincon ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Lans v. Adduci Mastriani & Schaumberg L.L.P.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Khatib v. Alliance Bankshares Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- IMARK Marketing Services, LLC v. Geoplast, S.P.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.