Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Aron-El v. Neal

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided May 12, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00532Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION TITUS ARON-EL, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:24-CV-532-GSL-JEM RON NEAL, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Titus Aron-El, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed an amended complaint. ECF 16. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted). Nevertheless, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court must review…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Burks v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API