Legal Opinion

STATE Ex GREENWOOD v. BAALS Et

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1940No. 194PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HAMILTON, PJ.

This is an original action, brought in this court, in which the relator, Greenwood, seeks a writ of prohibition, to prohibit the respondents from proceeding in a certain action in forcible entry and detainer.

A temporary writ was allowed, returnable on the day and at the time directed therein.

The respondents move to set aside the temporary writ, to refuse the application for a writ of prohibition, and to dismiss the petition of the relator, on the ground it does not state a cause of action, calling for the exercise of the extraordinary writ of prohibition.

In this…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Insurance Group v. McCowinOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. State Ex Rel. Cleveland Trust Co. v. Probate CourtOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. State ex rel. Cleveland Trust Co. v. Probate CourtOhio Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API