Legal Opinion
Leggio v. Oglesby
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 6, 1979PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
In this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, petitioner seeks to compel her reinstatement to the position of remedial reading teacher. Special Term directed appellants to reinstate petitioner. We agree and therefore affirm the judgment.
Section 2510 of the Education Law generally focuses on two major aspects of abolishing a position in a school system: (1) which employee should be terminated; and (2) the rights of the terminated employee to re-employment (cf. Matter of Ward v Nyquist, 43 NY2d 57). In dealing with which employee should be terminated, subdivision 2 of…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Mtr. Lezette v. Bd. of Educ., HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Chauvel v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Ward v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
4Cited by8 opinions
- Cole v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Lewis v. Cleveland Hill Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Kohler v. Board of Education, South Huntington Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Mahony v. Board of Education of Mahopac Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Du Bois v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.