Legal Opinion
Madera County Department of Social Services v. Carl C.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 22, 2008No. F054677PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORNELL, Acting P. J.
Carl C. appeals from an order terminating his parental rights to his daughter, A.C. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.) He contends the dependency court presiding over his child’s dependency erred by not appointing a guardian ad litem on his behalf because he was a person for whom a conservator had been appointed (Code Civ. Proc., § 372, subd. (a)) (hereafter section 372). In separate proceedings, a superior court previously found Carl was gravely disabled (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5008, subd. (h)) and consequently ordered and repeatedly renewed a conservator-ship for him…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Marilyn HCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re James F.California Supreme Court · 2008
- Kern Cty. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Deon C.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Kern County Department of Human Services v. Michael U.California Court of Appeal · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re D.C. CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- In re L.C. CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- In re P.P. CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2021