Keystone Associates v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Reynolds, J. (dissenting).
We would affirm the order of the Court of Claims dismissing appellant’s claim on the grounds that the court did not have jurisdiction of the subject matter and that the claim failed to state a cause of action.
The Court of Appeals decision in Matter of Keystone Assoc. v. Moerdler (19 N Y 2d 78, mot. for rearg. den. 19 N Y 2d 598) held that chapter 691 of the Laws of 1966 was unconstitutional in that it unreasonably deprived the appellant of the beneficial use of its property without payment of just compensation.
Clearly the statute would have been upheld had the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bernardine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Matter of Kesbec, Inc. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Kesbec, Inc. v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Matter of Kesbec, Inc. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1938