Legal Opinion

Colihan v. Miller

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Hearing of application for writ of peremptory mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

On June 17, 1910, Rudolph P. Miller, who then was and now is the superintendent of buildings of the city of ¡New York, sent a communication to the president of the borough of Manhattan (of whose office the bureau of buildings is a part) requesting a readjustment of the positions in his administrative force and his field and inspection force, and the transfer of moneys between certain accounts requisite to effect such readjustment. This so-called readjustment involved no additional appropriation beyond that allowed in the budget of 1910 for the bureaus affected, but in fact proved a saving of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hurlbut v. ConnollyNew York Supreme Court · 1915
  2. People ex rel. Machen v. HayesNew York Supreme Court · 1921
  3. People ex rel. O'Loughlin v. Board of Estimate & ApportionmentNew York Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API