Barnard v. Stone
Kentucky Supreme Court
1DissentStephens, Chief Justice
Respectfully, I must dissent. The majority’s opinion attempts, through its literal interpretation of KRS 118.315(2), to overturn an abundance of case law regarding what legally constitutes a valid signature. The current version of KRS 118.315(2), as enacted in 1974 and most recently amended in 1992, states in pertinent part:
The form of the petition shall be prescribed by the State Board of Elections. It shall be signed by the candidate and by registered voters from the district or jurisdiction from which the candidate seeks nomination.
The majority’s opinion asserts that the language in KRS…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Prichard v. KitchenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
- Ledford v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- McClellan v. Louisville Water CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
- Middlesboro Waterworks v. NealCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. First National Bank of PrestonsburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.