Craven v. Midland Milling Co.

The controversy herein was before this court on appeal, at the October Term, 1920. See Craven v. Midland Milling Co., 228 S. W. 513, where the appeal was dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to bring up all of the testimony when the only contention was that the court had erred in sustaining a demurrer to the evidence. It is now brought up on a writ of error.

Defendant runs a large milling establishment, eight stories high, the fourth floor of which is a large open room having therein a row of “roll machines” from which long pipes run up, together with such apparatus, as is necessary to convey the…