Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Board of Medical Examiners
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 22, 1989No. CA A45921PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
Petitioner seeks review of the Board of Medical Examiner’s order revoking her license to practice medicine. The order was based on ORS 677.190(18) and (23), which provide, respectively, that a revocation may be based on a physician’s:
“(18) Wilfully violating any provision of this chapter or any rule adopted by the board.
<<* * * * *
“(23) Refusing an invitation for an informal interview with the board requested under ORS 677.415.”
The basis for the Board’s conclusion that petitioner violated ORS 677.190(18) was that she had failed to comply with a subpena duces tecum issued pursuant to ORS…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Davidson v. Oregon Government Ethics CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Patton v. State Board of Higher EducationOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- McBeth v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
3Cited by9 opinions
- McNiel v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
- Solomon v. State Board of Physician Quality AssuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Gilbert v. Board of County Commissioners of Park CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Grobovsky v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Abbott v. Kansas Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.