Legal Opinion

Vincenti Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1965No. Appeal, No. 275Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This is an unemployment compensation case in which the claimant, Arthur Yincenti, was denied benefits by the compensation authorities on the ground that his base year earnings were insufficient. He had been employed for a period of eight weeks and one day by W. A. Morten, a landscape gardener in planting sod, trees and shrubs at new home sites. This was held to be agricultural labor and was excluded from his earnings. If it had been added to his earnings he would qualify for benefits. This appeal followed.

The compensation authorities held him to be an agricultural…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seley v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Lubold Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API