Legal Opinion
Doe v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 7, 2016No. 15-MC-1174 (JG)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN GLEESON, United States District Judge:
On June 23, 2015, Jane Doe moved to expunge a now thirteen-year-old fraud conviction due to its adverse impact on her ability to work. The conviction has proven troublesome for Doe because it appears in the government’s databases and in the New York City Professional Discipline Summaries. In other words, the conviction is visible to a prospective employer both as the result of a criminal background check and upon examination of her nursing license. Numerous employers have denied Doe a job because of her conviction. On more than…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Thomas Alan SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Don Morrow v. District of Columbia, in the Matter of Harry T. Alexander, Judge, District of Columbia Court of General SessionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Abdelfattah v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. NesbethDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Kozik v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2025
- Leddy v. BecerraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- United States v. DeerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017