Legal Opinion

Dayton Mall Motor Inn v. Honeywell, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 8, 1984No. Docket 67766Published

1Opinion of the Court

132 Mich. App. 174 (1984)

347 N.W.2d 15

DAYTON MALL MOTOR INN

v.

HONEYWELL, INC.

Docket No. 67766.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided February 8, 1984.

Honigman, Miller, Schwartz & Cohn (by Stephen F. Wasinger), for plaintiffs.

English & van Horne, P.C. (by John E. English and Alexander P. Madar), for defendants.

Before: CYNAR, P.J., and HOOD and R.J. JASON,[*] JJ.

2Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from the dismissal of their commercial contract action against defendants. The circuit judge declined the exercise of jurisdiction based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens.

Plaintiffs are both limited…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. ABKCO Industries, Inc. v. LennonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Cohane v. Arpeja-California, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Cray v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Anderson v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Wilburn v. WilburnDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API