Legal Opinion

Weining v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided March 3, 1961No. Motion No. 5792Published

1Opinion of the CourtCharles T. Major, J.

This is a motion for an order, pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act, for permission to file a late claim and to dispense with the printing of the claim.

■ Rule 9 of the Rules of the Court of Claims, among other things, provides that the original claim and copies thereof may be either typewritten or printed. The order requested is, therefore, unnecessary.

One of the prime requisites in a motion to file a late 'claim is that the proposed claim alleges a meritorious cause of action against the State. An examination of the proposed claim shows that G-eorge A. Weining,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bienstock v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API