Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Taft v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 12, 1998No. 98-364PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the request for expedited review and the motions for leave to intervene be, and hereby are, granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion to dismiss be, and hereby is, denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondents shall not proceed further in the case entitled, Zanotti v. Taft, case No. 98CVH02-1355.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that we reassert our continuing jurisdiction over DeRolph v. State and resolve any election-related challenge to the May 5, 1998 election that may affect our decision in DeRolph v. State.
IT IS FURTHER…
2Cited by11 opinions
- DeRolph v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Triton Servs., Inc. v. ReedOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- DeRolph v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- DeRolph v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- DeRolph v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.