Legal Opinion
Knuckles v. Helton
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided February 1, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMMACK, Chief Justice.
On June 14, 1949 we affirmed the judgment in the case of Knuckles v. Woolum, 311 Ky. 262, 223 S.W.2d 886. The dispute in that case related to the location of a boundary line agreed upon in 1888 by W. R. Knuckles and H. W. Neal, predecessors in title of the parties to this appeal. Included in an instrument executed by Knuckles and Neal were a description of the boundary and a notation that the line had been marked. Reference is made to the Knuckles v. Woolum opinion for further development of the facts and of the contentions of the parties.
In July 1950 the appellants…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lindsey v. Kentucky Development Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Collinsworth v. Harvey Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- Jones' Adm'x v. MayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Pearce v. CoogleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sharp v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
- Durbin v. Nally, Ballard, & Saltsman, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955