Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 17, 1976No. Z-332PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAWLS, Acting Chief Judge.

By amended information, appellant was charged in Count I with breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny, in Count II with grand larceny, and in Count III with unlawfully receiving or aiding in the concealment of stolen property, knowing the same to have been stolen.

Prior to taking testimony, appellant’s attorney moved the court to instruct the state to make an election between Counts II and III on the ground that the counts were inconsistent and repugnant to each other. The trial judge denied the motion. This motion was renewed following presentation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bargesser v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  3. Tidwell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  4. Carlton v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Patrus, Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Broward County1977
  2. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API