Legal Opinion

Schulman v. Houston, W. S. & P. F. Railroad

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided December 18, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from jury term. Action by Ida Schulman against the Houston, West Street & Pavonia Ferry Railroad Company for personal injuries. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcADAM, J.

The action is to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff. While attempting to cross the defendant’s tracks at Broadway and Broome streets, on October 26, 1893, she was knocked down by one of defendant’s cable cars, called by her the “south-bound car.” The accident occurred ■shortly after 6 p. m., when the plaintiff was going home from work, her route lying across Broadway. The plaintiff attempted to cross on the upper crossing at Broome street. She looked around, and observed a north-bound car very near the corner, and the south-bound car apparently about half a block…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fenton v. . Second Avenue Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Byrne v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Kennedy v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burian v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Denver City Tramway Co. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. Saylor v. Union Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Anderson v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
  5. Tupper v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API