Legal Opinion

State of North Carolina v. Davis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 2008No. COA07-648PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Where the admission of certain pieces of evidence by the trial court did not constitute plain error, a new trial is not warranted. Where defendant failed to follow the statutory procedure for challenging an allegedly unqualified juror, defendant has failed to preserve the issue for appellate review.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

In August of 2005, K.T., aged 10, lived in Durham with her mother, younger brother D.T., younger sister N.T., and her mother’s boyfriend, Michael Rayshawn Davis (defendant). KT.’s mother worked as a receptionist, arriving home at 6:00 or 6:15 p.m.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. TiradoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. TiradoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. State v. ArringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. BettsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  4. State v. CruseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Williams v. Marchelle Isyk AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API