Legal Opinion

Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Kukucz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1929No. 21736PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

This court is of opinion that the Court of Appeals, in view of the failure to incorporate the defendant’s testimony in the bill of exceptions, erred in reversing the judgment of the trial court. The record discloses that both parties offered evidence, but that the evidence offered by the defendant was not incorporated in the bill. The motion of the defendant for a directed verdict was made and sustained at the close of the evidence. What the proof offered by the defendant was, whether it countervailed the proof of plaintiff on the issue of negligence, or sustained its issue of contributory…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tyrrell v. Investment Associates, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Brown v. HouseholderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Weaver v. WhalenOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Tyrrell v. Investment Associates, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API