Legal Opinion
United States v. Samuel A. Carmel, Defendant-Appelleant
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 5, 1959No. 20-1091PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge.
Samuel A. Carmel, defendant, appeals from a judgment of conviction based upon a jury’s verdict finding him guilty, as charged in an indictment, counts I and II of which alleged that he and co-defendant Newton Elmo Renfro transported two automobiles from St. Louis, Missouri to Chicago, Illinois, knowing the same to have been stolen, and count III of which alleged a conspiracy between the same parties to commit the aforesaid offenses.
Renfro pleaded guity to each count and testified for the government on the trial of defendant.
It is defendant’s contention that there…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Starr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Gomila v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Adler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1910
- Hunter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- The United States of America v. Sheldon Wheeler and William McGowanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. FernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- United States v. CassiagnolCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Joseph S. BukowskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- United States v. William T. Panza, United States of America v. John TatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Harold W. BarbourCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.