Cofield v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Presiding Judge.
The award denying compensation is based solely on the ground that the deputy director, and later the full board, found that the notice required by Code § 114-303 had not been given to the employer; and the claimant, while also referring to other statutory grounds of appeal, relies upon the ground: “The facts found by the members do not support the order or decree.” Code § 114-710 (3).
The findings of the deputy director, approved by the full board, were in part as follows: “I find from the testimony of Rudine Cofield . . . that she sustained an injury to her left foot…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davison-Paxon Co. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Railway Express Agency Inc. v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Fountain v. Georgia Marble Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Crews v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- Federated Insurance Group v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- EMPLOYERS COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY v. OffuttCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Crystal Springs Bleachery v. RoachCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Crystal Springs Bleachery v. RoachCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971