Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Davis

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 16, 1983No. 82-1575PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COWART, Judge.

Petitioner here seeks a writ of mandamus from this court compelling the respondent to appoint a psychiatric expert to examine the defendant and to assist the defense in exploring the possibility of an insanity defense.

Petitioner is charged with attempted murder and aggravated battery and is presently represented by the public defender. Petitioner’s counsel filed an “application for defense psychiatric expert” requesting the court to appoint a psychiatric expert pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.216 alleging that counsel was court appointed and that “he has reason…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. De Groot v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Tascano v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. Sandegren v. STATE, ETC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. Fasenmyer v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  5. City of Winter Garden v. NORFLOR CONST.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Rigabar v. BroomeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. McKinniss v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API