Legal Opinion

State v. Nadal

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 11, 1886PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Madison District Gourt. Defendant was indicted for bigamy, and, upon conviction, was sentenced to tlie penitentiary for two years and six months. lie now appeals to this court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

I. The objections to the judgment of conviction complained of by defendant will be considered in the order of their discussion in the printed arguments of counsel.

*4801. bigamy; otK slate! cohabitation in lowa. *479The statute defining the crime of bigamy (Code, § 4d09) *480is in the following language: “If any person who has a former husband or wife living marry another person, or continue to cohabit with such second , , husband or wile m this state, he or she * * * is guilty of bigamy.”

The district court, in substance, instructed the jury that if defendant and Mrs. Loftus, the woman with whom he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Dale v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. State v. BrandenbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  5. State v. RockerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API