Legal Opinion

Sacks v. WINKLER

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1967No. 20,490Published

1Opinion

Denial of Petition for Rehearing

Bierly, J.

Appellant has filed what he entitles a “Motion to Reinstate Appeal.” Such a motion is proper only when the appeal has been dismissed for want of prosecution by this court in accordance with Burns’ Anno. Stat. § 2-3230 (1964 Replacement). However, the substance rather than the title governs its true nature, and its substance is that of a petition for rehearing, and we shall treat it as such. See: Fort Wayne Mercantile, etc. Assn. v. Scott (1919), 71 Ind. App. 266, 123 N. E. 718, motion to reinstate denied, 71 Ind. App. 266, 124 N. E. 710.

The above…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Wright, Mayor, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Sacks v. WINKLERIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Stampfer v. Peter Hand Brewing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. State Ex Rel. Klutey v. Daviess Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Slagle v. ValenzianoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API