Legal Opinion

United States v. Oscar Ceballos

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 7, 2011No. 09-50502PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Oscar Ceballos pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. He requested that the district court recommend a Southern California housing designation to the Bureau of Prisons. At the sentencing hearing, neither the district court nor counsel addressed this request. Eight days later, Ceballos and the government filed a joint stipulation asking the court to revise the Judgment and Commitment Order to include the designation recommendation. The district court denied the request. Ceballos appeals, asserting jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and/or 18 U.S.C. §…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. UNITED STATES of America, v. Frank SERAFINI; United States of America, v. Frank SerafiniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Howard HandaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Vincent CaterinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Buddie Lee SmarttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. Raymond Surratt, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Michael LesterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. Joel WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  4. State v. PatrickOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. United States v. Lavoris F. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API