Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Waters

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 9, 1983No. 3 Div. 761Published

1Dissent

On the basis of the record before us, to which we are restricted in our resolution of this issue, I find no evidence that the trial judge arrogated to himself any power that is solely within the province of the jury, or that any unusual circumstances exist amounting to a judicial usurpation of powers by the trial judge. A review of the correctness of the trial judge's decision to grant a motion for a new trial is not within the purview of mandamus. In my view, intervention by mandamus is not merited. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

Judgment reversed, Ala., 453 So.2d 1066, on remand,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WatersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. State v. WatersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API