Legal Opinion

Allen v. Mowry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 1923No. Appeal, No. 322PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 322, Jan. T., 1923, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Bedford Co,, April T., 1922, No. 1, for specific performance, in case of Charles W. Allen and John S. Brice v. Yirgie M. Mowry et al. Bill for specific performance. Before Bailey, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Decree for plaintiffs. Defendants appealed. Error assigned, inter alia, was decree, quoting it.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

Plaintiffs’ bill asks specific performance of a contract for sale of real estate situate in the Borough of Bedford, known as Washington’s Headquarters. A demurrer to the bill was overruled and defendants answered, to which a formal replication was entered and testimony taken on behalf of plaintiffs. Defendants offered no evidence but at the close of plaintiffs’ testimony moved to dismiss the bill. Exceptions to the court’s findings were dismissed and a decree entered granting the prayer of the bill.

Edward M. Pennell, an attorney, acting for defendants, the owners,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Witman v. City of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. McHale v. ReillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Welsh Et Ux. v. Ford Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Axe v. PottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Peoples Trust Co. v. Consumers Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API