Cunningham v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
The questions on appeal are threefold: (1) whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion for continuance where the defendant had substituted new counsel shortly before trial and where this new counsel had difficulty in obtaining transcripts of the completed trial of co-indictees; (2) whether defendant could first consent to the admission of the co-indictees’ statements and convictions (as part of a trial strategy of blaming the co-indictees for the crimes) and then argue on appeal that such evidence should not have been admitted; and (3) whether this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Holcomb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Corbin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Brady v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Coaxum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Glass v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Rose v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Whitaker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Blackford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Bogan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.