Carriere v. Meyer
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PROBATES, FOR THE PARISH OF ST. The plaintiffs having obtained a judgment against the estate of Ursin Gonsoulin, deceased, administered by his widow, Emilie Leocadie Meyer, tutrix of the children, for the sum of one thousand five hundred and forty-five dollars andl sixty-five cents, took a rule on her, alleging that more than three months had elapsed since she should have rendered an account, and filed her tableau of distribution of the funds, of the…
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PROBATES, FOR THE PARISH OF ST. The plaintiffs having obtained a judgment against the estate of Ursin Gonsoulin, deceased, administered by his widow, Emilie Leocadie Meyer, tutrix of the children, for the sum of one thousand five hundred and forty-five dollars andl sixty-five cents, took a rule on her, alleging that more than three months had elapsed since she should have rendered an account, and filed her tableau of distribution of the funds, of the estate of her deceased husband ; and that it has been shown she has funds in her hands belonging to said ¿estate. It…
1Opinion of the CourtMorphy, J.
Plaintiff having obtained a judgment against the defendant as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, Ursin Gonsoulin, had a rule served on her several years after-wards, to show cause why they should not be authorized to take out against her an execution under which her property, to a sufficient amount to satisfy their judgment, should be seized and sold. To this rule the defendant made answer, that she had paid privileged debts of her husband’s estate to a large amount; the vouchers for which, she would exhibit on the trial of the case; and that there was not a sufficiency of…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Thompson v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Castille v. ChacéréSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
- Collins v. HollierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
- Succession of HeffnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897