Legal Opinion
Collins v. Promark Products, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 12, 1991No. 87 Civ. 2411 (WK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, Senior District Judge.
On April 8, we filed an opinion denying the government’s motion seeking dismissal of the third-party complaint against it. Thereafter we received a letter from the government in further support of such motion. Construing that letter as a motion for reargument, we grant it.
The letter includes citations to several cases which the government accurately asserts contain language having a bearing on the result at which we arrived: Central R.R. Co. of N.J. v. Jersey City (1908), 209 U.S. 473, 28 S.Ct. 592, 52 L.Ed. 896 (Holmes, J.); People v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wilmington & Weldon Railroad v. AlsbrookSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Ferguson v. . RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Hoge v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
- The People v. . Central R.R. Co. of N.J.New York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Central R. Co. of NJ v. Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ashmore v. Northeast Petroleum Division of Cargill, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1994
- Terry Collins v. Promark Products, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party United States of America, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996